Appeal to Repeal‏

The implications for our nation's desire to repeal the 14th Amendment are great, yet shocking.

First, the 14th Amendment of our constitution basically grants that anyone born within the borders of our nation is considered an American citizen. This has unfortunately been taken advantage of as many illegal immigrants come to the United States, give birth and then use their children to sponsor their requests for permanent residency. As many as 340,000 of these "anchor babies" are born in the United States every year.

This has caused for millions of dollars to be spent on welfare systems in each state every year.

As of July of this year, the estimated number of Mexican nationals in America was 1 in 8. That means that over 10% of Mexicans live here in America illegally. To put it another way, in 2009, the Mexican population was over 111 million. This means that almost 16 million illegal immigrants - from Mexico alone - are drawing benefits from our social programs.

We are footing the bill.

Think of the ramifications of having that many people from any nation entering our own. One of the major problems of this invasion is that if granted amnesty like the Usurper in Chief's administration wants, this is an extremely large block of potential voters.

If amnesty is granted, we will never see conservative values in our nation again.

The resolution put on the table by GOP congressional leaders is to repeal the 14th Amendment. This would in fact resolve the "anchor baby" issue. However, we would find ourselves in a scarier time than now.

Imagine this, Nancy Pelosi said in 2003 that a baby isn't a person until 30 days after they go home from the hospital. If the 14th Amendment is repealed, and the "progressive leftists" remain anywhere close to power, this could be extended until the age 18. This may sound like a stretch, but it isn’t a very big one.

How would your children be able to "earn" their citizenship?

Imagine counter balancing the political power of 16 million voters spread across America. A rather large concession would have to be offered in order to convince the Usurper in Chief not to veto this bill.

The Usurper in Chief has an idea. What he has suggested in the past is that every citizen has an obligation to serve in a "civic service" not unlike a civilian military assigned to police our neighborhoods "for the greater good.” Basically, we earn our "right" to be a citizen by policing our own friends and neighbors.

Including a clause such as one that mandates a civic duty requirement to receive citizenship is one of the few ways that the Usurper in Chief would even consider signing a bill like this.

If we don't give him this, any other cost would be just as devastating.

Here’s a positive solution though so long as we can get past the Usurper in Chief. Amend the 14th Amendment to state that any child born to one or both parents of illegal status do not receive “birthright” citizenship. Of course, this is really going to upset some of those Liberation theorists and leftist progressives in Washington D.C.

Folks, it is time to stand up. Time to fight against our nation being stolen by illegal immigrants and dirty politics. Let us amend the 14th Amendment and not repeal it all together leaving our nation susceptible to mandated civic duties. Let us remove the concern with “anchor babies” and reallocate those Welfare funds to Americans who really need it. If we find Mexican or other illegal immigrants coming here to have babies, pop them out and send them back.

We should be more willing to help someone once than to support them for generations. You don’t pay taxes for that. You pay taxes for roads, schools, police and our military (etc.). Following this idea will save American money and resources… for Americans.

Re: Banning our Ammo!

The EPA denied the petition prohibiting the use and production of lead based hunting ammunition.

http://yosemite.epa.gov/opa/admpress.nsf/0/48D939B5009411038525778C00768006

To read the letter sent to the petitioner in response the decision, go here: http://www.epa.gov/oppt/chemtest/pubs/Owens_Petition_Response.pdf

Obama Deception: Liberation Theology and the Usurper in Chief

Have you ever turned on your television and wondered what the next Obama deception was going to be? Or have you ever felt that our Usurper in Chief was acting directly against the wishes of everyone you know? How about considering the option that the Usurper in Chief is making specific decisions that are going to destroy our nation.

Well, it’s unfortunate but you are absolutely right in feeling this way.

Why would any U.S. President act in such a way?

The Usurper in chief is doing as he feels is necessary to "restore" America, and it has a lot to do with Reverend Wright and their liberation theology.

Before I delve too far into the inner workings of our Usurper in Chief, let's take a look at what the general context of "Liberation Theology" really is.

"Liberation Theology is presented as the effort to think clearly about the meaning of religious faith in the context of oppression, war, poverty, inequality and environmental destruction, and the effort to live a compassionate, courageous and life-sustaining response to those conditions. Over the past several decades, people inspired by Liberation Theology have sought to give voice to a response that both addresses the needs of those who are injured and oppressed, and also works to change the structures and ongoing processes of injury and oppression (http://liberationtheology.org/)."

What does this mean and how will it affect us?

Well, it means that as long as the Usurper in Chief is in office, he is right. Right about the fact that we, America, are no longer a Christian nation. We no longer follow the moral and ethical guidelines that our nation was founded on with the teachings of Christ or Scripturally sound principles.

It means that anyone who was offended, oppressed, belittled or "hated," will find a "social justice" defined by the progressive leftists currently in office.

Conservative values are now under attack. Looking at several recent controversies in the political realm, we can see this. Here's a few examples "liberation theology" will take and twist, and what to expect if the Usurper in Chief had his way.

Since marriage is a controversial issue in recent news, let's look at that. Conservative values propose that marriage shall be between one man and one. Since liberation theology states that the oppressed will have social justice, gay marriage is almost a guarantee under the Obama regime.

Homosexuals will either 1) be able to marry, or 2) convince our government to not recognize ANY marriage and have all marriages recognized as civil unions only.

Liberation theology also explains why the Usurper in Chief has Kevin Jennings as his education czar. Jennings is a proponent of the "gay education" of kindergarten-aged children. This is a type of education program many public schools are adopting which utilizes same-sex couples in text books and educates that homosexuality is an accepted and at times the "better" lifestyle. Parents don't even have the option to opt out of this program.

Due to the Usurper in Chief's liberation theology, this also explains the proposition of the Hate Crimes Bill. This bill allows special protections to individuals who are of a racial or sexual oriented minority. Say a voyeur, flashes your spouse or your child. Of course, you or your spouse might react with a slap or punch. However, while the flasher will receive a state misdemeanor charge, your spouse would receive a federal felony because the flasher was "discriminated" against because of their sexual proclivities.

Liberation theology is why the Usurper in Chief supports every religion but Christianity. The Usurper in Chief actually seems to support Islam over any other religion. If he isn't a Jihadist himself then their feelings of needing to destroy America is "socially justified" somehow, which is why he promotes Islam as his "favored" religion.

The last example of how liberation theology is destroying our nation through the hands of our Usurper in chief, examine the New Black Panther movement. They were taken to court and charged with voter fraud and intimidation. For "some" reason, the Department of Justice dropped the charges, regardless of the fact that they were caught on video threatening voters in Pennsylvania in 2008.

Have you seen other examples this liberation theology being applied to certain "types" of people who claim discrimination being "socially justified" by the Usurper in Chief?

I believe you have.