The Change Obama Promised is Coming! Part 3

This is the conclusion of this series.  Here is the third wave of tax changes that we are to expect next year.

Third Wave:The Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT) and Employer Tax Hikes:

When Americans prepare to file their tax returns in January of 2011, they'll be in for a nasty surprise - the AMT won't be held harmless, and many tax relief provisions will have expired.

The major items include:The AMT will ensnare over 28 million families, up from 4 million last year:

According to the left-leaning Tax Policy Center, Congress' failure to index the AMT will lead to an explosion of AMT taxpaying families - rising from 4 million last year to 28.5 million. These families will have to calculate their tax burdens twice, and pay taxes at the higher level. The AMT was created in 1969 to ensnare a handful of taxpayers.

Small business expensing will be slashed and 50% expensing will disappear:
Small businesses can normally expense (rather than slowly-deduct, or "depreciate") equipment purchases up to $250,000.
This will be cut all the way down to $25,000. Larger businesses can currently expense half of their purchases of equipment.
In January of 2011, all of it will have to be "depreciated."
Taxes will be raised on all types of businesses:

There are literally scores of tax hikes on business that will take place. The biggest is the loss of the "research and experimentation tax credit," but there are many, many others. Combining high marginal tax rates with the loss of this tax relief will cost jobs.


Tax Benefits for Education and Teaching Reduced:

The deduction for tuition and fees will not be available.

Tax credits for education will be limited.

Teachers will no longer be able to deduct classroom expenses.

Coverdell Education Savings Accounts will be cut.

Employer-provided educational assistance is curtailed.

The student loan interest deduction will be disallowed for hundreds of thousands of families.


Charitable Contributions from IRAs no longer allowed:

Under current law, a retired person with an IRA can contribute up to $100,000 per year directly to a charity from their IRA.
This contribution also counts toward an annual "required minimum distribution." This ability will no longer be there.

And worse yet? Now, your insurance will be INCOME on your W2's!

One of the surprises we'll find come next year, is what follows - - a little "surprise" that 99% of us had no idea was included in the "new and improved" healthcare legislation . . . the dupes, er, dopes, who backed this administration will be astonished!

Starting in 2011, (next year folks), your W-2 tax form sent by your employer will be increased to show the value of whatever health insurance you are given by the company. It does not matter if that's a private concern or governmental body of some sort.

If you're retired, so what... your gross will go up by the amount of insurance you get.

You will be required to pay taxes on a large sum of money that you have never seen. Take your tax form you just finished and see what $15,000 or $20,000 additional gross does to your tax debt. That's what you'll pay next year.

For many, it also puts you into a new higher bracket so it's even worse.

This is how the government is going to buy insurance for the15% that don't have insurance and it's only part of the tax increases.

Not believing this??? Here is a research of the summaries....

On page 25 of 29: TITLE IX REVENUE PROVISIONS- SUBTITLE A: REVENUE OFFSET PROVISIONS-(sec. 9001, as modified by sec. 10901) Sec.9002 "requires employers to include in the W-2 form of each employee the aggregate cost of applicable employer sponsored group health coverage that is excludable from the employees gross income."- Joan Pryde is the senior tax editor for the Kiplinger letters.
- Go to Kiplingers and read about 13 tax changes that could affect you. Number 3 is what is above.

*Here is what I need from you, as my reader.  Email these articles to everyone you know.  Get out and vote this November! The only way we can hope to fight this is to vote!*

The Change Obama Promised is Coming! Part 2

Yesterday I posted for you the changes in our taxes that we face next year.  Today is the second wave of taxes that we are to face.

Second Wave:OBAMACAREThere are over twenty new or higher taxes in Obamacare. Several will first go into effect on January 1, 2011. They include:

The "Medicine Cabinet Tax":

Thanks to Obamacare, Americans will no longer be able to use health savings account (HSA), flexible spending account (FSA), or health reimbursement (HRA) pre-tax dollars to purchase non-prescription, over-the-counter medicines (except insulin).


The "Special Needs Kids Tax":

This provision of Obamacare imposes a cap on flexible spending accounts (FSAs) of $2500 (Currently, there is no federal government limit). There is one group of FSA owners for whom this new cap will be particularly cruel and onerous: parents of special needs children.

There are thousands of families with special needs children in the United States , and many of them use FSAs to pay for special needs education.

Tuition rates at one leading school that teaches special needs children in Washington, D.C. National Child Research Center ) can easily exceed $14,000 per year. Under tax rules, FSA dollars cannot be used to pay for this type of special needs education.


The HSA (Health Savings Account) Withdrawal Tax Hike:

This provision of Obamacare increases the additional tax on non-medical early withdrawals from an HSA from 10 to 20 percent, disadvantaging them relative to IRAs and other tax-advantaged accounts, which remain at 10 percent.

*Stay tuned tomorrow for the Second wave of tax hikes expected next year!*

The Change Obama Promised is Coming! Part 1

Great information - is a bit long, but necessary.

Finally, the CHANGE he promised us is coming JANUARY 1, 2011 in just three months, on January 1, 2011, the largest tax hikes in the history of America will take effect.

They will hit families and small businesses in three great waves.

On January 1, 2011, here's what happens... (read it to the end, so you see all three waves)...

First Wave:Expiration of 2001 and 2003 Tax Relief:

In 2001 and 2003, the GOP Congress enacted several tax cuts for investors, small business owners, and families.
These will all expire on January 1, 2011.

Personal income tax rates will rise:

The top income tax rate will rise from 35 to 39.6 percent (this is also the rate at which two-thirds of small business profits are taxed).
The lowest rate will rise from 10 to 15 percent.
All the rates in between will also rise.

Itemized deductions and personal exemptions will again phase out, which has the same mathematical effect as higher marginal tax rates:

The full list of marginal rate hikes is below:

* The 10% bracket rises to an expanded 15%

* The 25% bracket rises to 28%

* The 28% bracket rises to 31%

* The 33% bracket rises to 36%

* The 35% bracket rises to 39.6%.

Higher taxes on marriage and family:

The "marriage penalty" (narrower tax brackets for married couples) will return from the first dollar of income.
The child tax credit will be cut in half from $1000 to $500 per child.

The standard deduction will no longer be doubled for married couples relative to the single level.
The dependent care and adoption tax credits will be cut.


The return of the Death Tax:

This year only, there is no death tax. (It's a quirk!)
For those dying on or after January 1, 2011, there is a 55 percent top death tax rate on estates over $1 million. A person leaving behind two homes, a business, a retirement account, could easily pass along a death tax bill to their loved ones. Think of the farmers who don't make much money, but their land, which they purchased years ago with after-tax dollars, is now worth a lot of money. Their children will have to sell the farm, which may be their livelihood, just to pay the estate tax if they don't have the cash sitting around to pay the tax.
Think about your own family's assets. Maybe your family owns real estate, or a business that doesn't make much money, but the building and equipment are worth $1 million. Upon their death, you can inherit the $1 million business tax free, but if they own a home, stock, cash worth $500K on top of the $1 million business, then you will owe the government $275,000 cash! That's 55% of the value of the assets over $1 million!
Do you have that kind of cash sitting around waiting to pay the estate tax?

Higher tax rates on savers and investors:

The capital gains tax will rise from 15 percent this year to 20 percent in 2011.

The dividends tax will rise from 15 percent this year to 39.6 percent in 2011.

These rates will rise another 3.8 percent in 2013.

 

*Stay tuned tomorrow for the Second wave of tax hikes expected next year!*

Obama: Mexicans Were Here Long Before America was even an Idea

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2010/09/21/obama_mexicans_were_here_long_before_america_was_even_an_idea.html

Long before America was even an idea, this land of plenty was home to many peoples. The British and French, the Dutch and Spanish, to Mexicans, to countless Indian tribes. We all shared the same land."

Mexico declared its independence on September 16, 1810. It was recognized on September 27, 1821.

The United States of America declared its independence in 1776.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2010/09/21/obama_mexicans_were_here_long_before_america_was_even_an_idea.html

Examiner Editorial: Obamacare is Even Worse Than Critics Thought

I excerpted this because it seemed appropriate to all of you, as we all are going to be affected by this soon enough.
Examiner Editorial
September 22, 2010








Much more has been revealed about Obamacare since President Obama, Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi pushed the bill on Americans six months ago. (J. Scott Applewhite/AP file)


Six months ago, President Obama, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi rammed Obamacare down the throats of an unwilling American public. Half a year removed from the unprecedented legislative chicanery and backroom dealing that characterized the bill's passage, we know much more about the bill than we did then. A few of the revelations:

» Obamacare won't decrease health care costs for the government. According to Medicare's actuary, it will increase costs. The same is likely to happen for privately funded health care.

» As written, Obamacare covers elective abortions, contrary to Obama's promise that it wouldn't. This means that tax dollars will be used to pay for a procedure millions of Americans across the political spectrum view as immoral. Supposedly, the Department of Health and Human Services will bar abortion coverage with new regulations but these will likely be tied up for years in litigation, and in the end may not survive the court challenge.

» Obamacare won't allow employees or most small businesses to keep the coverage they have and like. By Obama's estimates, as many as 69 percent of employees, 80 percent of small businesses, and 64 percent of large businesses will be forced to change coverage, probably to more expensive plans.

» Obamacare will increase insurance premiums -- in some places, it already has. Insurers, suddenly forced to cover clients' children until age 26, have little choice but to raise premiums, and they attribute to Obamacare's mandates a 1 to 9 percent increase. Obama's only method of preventing massive rate increases so far has been to threaten insurers.

» Obamacare will force seasonal employers -- especially the ski and amusement park industries -- to pay huge fines, cut hours, or lay off employees.

» Obamacare forces states to guarantee not only payment but also treatment for indigent Medicaid patients. With many doctors now refusing to take Medicaid (because they lose money doing so), cash-strapped states could be sued and ordered to increase reimbursement rates beyond their means.

» Obamacare imposes a huge nonmedical tax compliance burden on small business. It will require them to mail IRS 1099 tax forms to every vendor from whom they make purchases of more than $600 in a year, with duplicate forms going to the Internal Revenue Service. Like so much else in the 2,500-page bill, our senators and representatives were apparently unaware of this when they passed the measure.

» Obamacare allows the IRS to confiscate part or all of your tax refund if you do not purchase a qualified insurance plan. The bill funds 16,000 new IRS agents to make sure Americans stay in line.



Read more at the Washington Examiner: http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/Obamacare-is-even-worse-than-critics-thought-960772-103571664.html#ixzz11GY8zdvx

What Did Obama Do?

http://www.noquarterusa.net/blog/2010/09/29/what-did-obama-do/
This is a reposting:

If George W. Bush had proposed to double the debt within 10 years, would you have approved?

If George W. Bush had criticized a state law that he admitted he never even read, would you think that he is just an ignorant hot head?

If George W. Bush joined the country of Mexico and sued a state in the United States to force that state to continue to allow illegal immigration, would you question his patriotism and wonder who’s side he was on?

If George W. Bush had put 87,000 workers out of work by arbitrarily placing a moratorium on offshore oil drilling on companies that have one of the best safety records of any industry because one company had an accident would you have agreed?

If George W. Bush had used a forged document as the basis of the moratorium that would render 87,000 American workers unemployed would you support him? 

If George W. Bush had been the first President to need a TelePrompTer installed to be able to get through a press conference, would you have laughed and said this is more proof of how inept he is on his own and is really controlled by smarter men behind the scenes?

If George W. Bush had spent hundreds of thousands of dollars to take Laura Bush to a play in NYC, would you have approved?

If George W. Bush had reduced your retirement plan’s holdings of GM stock by 90% and given the unions a majority stake in GM, would you have approved?

If George W. Bush had made a joke at the expense of the Special Olympics, would you have approved?

If George W. Bush had given Gordon Brown a set of inexpensive and incorrectly formatted DVDs, when Gordon Brown had given him a thoughtful and historically significant gift, would you have approved?

If George W. Bush had given the Queen of England an iPod containing videos of his speeches, would you have thought this embarrassingly narcissistic and tacky?

If George W. Bush had visited Austria and made reference to the nonexistent “Austrian language,” would you have brushed it off as a minor slip?

If George W. Bush had filled his cabinet and circle of advisers with people who cannot seem to keep current in their income taxes, would you have approved?

If George W. Bush had stated that there were 57 states in the United States, would you have said that he is clueless.

If George W. Bush would have flown all the way to Denmark to make a five minute speech about how the Olympics would benefit him walking out his front door in Texas, would you have thought he was a self important, conceited, egotistical jerk.

If George W. Bush had been so Spanish illiterate as to refer to “Cinco de Cuatro” in front of the Mexican ambassador when it was the 5th of May (Cinco de Mayo), and continued to flub it when he tried again, would you have winced in embarrassment?

If George W. Bush had misspelled the word “advice” would you have hammered him for it for years like Dan Quayle and potatoes as proof of what a dunce he is?

If George W. Bush had burned 9,000 gallons of jet fuel to go plant a single tree on Earth Day, would you have concluded he’s a hypocrite?

If George W. Bush’s administration had okayed Air Force One flying low over millions of people followed by a jet fighter in downtown Manhattan causing widespread panic, would you have wondered whether they actually get what happened on 9-11?

If George W. Bush had failed to send relief aid to flood victims throughout the Midwest with more people killed or made homeless than in New Orleans (due to Katrina), would you want it made into a major ongoing political issue with claims of racism and incompetence?

If George W. Bush had created the position of 32 Czars who report directly to him, bypassing the House and Senate on much of what is happening in America, would you have approved.

If George W. Bush had ordered the firing of the CEO of a major corporation, even though he had no constitutional authority to do so, would you have approved?
If this these incidents did not occur under George W. Bush’s watch, I wonder who was at the helm when they did…?

Come Thanksgiving, George W. will be giving thanks for Barack. Next to Barack and his “accomplishments” Bush is looking like a genius.

The Consequence of Declaring War

The great messianic fallacy has declared war on the United States of America. This is going to be presented in a few parts and laid out so we may see what the Usurper in Chief is actually doing.

1 – The Creation of Separatists

Over the past few weeks, our treasonous Usurper in Chief and his minions have condemned Arizona both verbally (press conferences) and written (Human Rights Counsel Report) for long overdue immigration legislation. He has done this while proclaiming that he has never read the legislation. It only makes him look like a fool.

However, the consequences of appealing to the United Nations Human Rights Counsel in order to condemn the state of Arizona to international law will be dire. He essentially told Arizona that they are subject to International judiciaries and no longer under the protection of the United States. Being that each of the states in the US are sovereign in their own right, the Federal government is Constitutionally subservient to the states. In other words, the Federal government derives its power from the states, not the other way around, as they would have us believe.

Already there have been 22 states that have placed immigration legislation on the tables of their State Congresses (http://www.alipac.us/ftopic-196989-0.html). Of these states, eleven have filed a “friend of the court” brief with the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals arguing that a federal judge was wrong to block implementation of key provisions of the law. Alabama, Florida, Idaho, Louisiana, Michigan, Nebraska, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South Dakota, Texas and Virginia joined in the filing (http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/09/04/states-join-legal-brief-supporting-ariz-immigration-law-donations-roll-gov/).


Basically, this means that these states have filed with the court to offer testimony or legal assistance on behalf of Arizona.

What does this means for us? Well, consider this. The Usurper in Chief has already taken one state to the United Nations, what is holding him back from doing it again? Absolutely nothing. That means that he will be submitting almost half of the nation to the United Nations for a judgment that is not even in their jurisdiction. He has essentially offered one state to the chopping block and will most likely follow suit with the others.

Taken by itself, what could be more offensive than the federal government trying to bring down world opinion against a single state? A state that that same federal government was created and has a duty to protect. But coupled with the potential for taking the remaining states to the United Nations and you have yourself a segmented group of states that have been isolated from the rest of the nation, which may well, result in succession by those states and civil war.

2 – Financial Destruction

There are a few major points to consider when evaluating American economic policies lately. Spending is way out of hand. The first stimulus didn’t work and the White House administration is proposing a second one (http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2010/09/a-second-stimulus/62543/). Obama-care is going to cost even more and they want to add a “Cap and Trade” tax on all carbon emissions produced by energy and production companies.

“Cap and Trade” taxation is but one razor that will slice the wrists of our productivity and the incurred costs will only be passed down to Americans through surcharges and other means. This will even further destroy our middle class.

A value added tax – or VAT – if implemented means that anytime a good is produced or improved upon, there will be a tax charged on the seller. Take a loaf of bread for example, the wheat is harvested – tax, the mill grinds the wheat into flour – tax, another company makes yeast – tax, the dairy farm milks the cows – tax, the chicken farmer collects eggs – tax, the baker bakes the bread – tax. This could mean we end up paying $10.00 for a loaf of bread. Essentially starving Americans into submission.

The last of many financial attacks brought to Americans under the guise of “making a better America,” is the hush-hush pushing through of the Transaction Tax. This is a tax that I have discussed with all recently and can be found here - http://secondamendmentman.blogspot.com/2010/08/tax-storm-is-coming.html. “This ‘Transaction Tax’ would impose a 1% tax on every transaction except buying and selling stock. If you use your debit cards, credit cards, cash, check book, transfer funds from checking to savings, put money into an IRA for retirement. Every time you pay with a check card to buy gas, 1%. Every time you buy baby formula in cash, 1%. Every time you buy toilet paper, 1%. water, rent, mortgage, insurance, deposit a paycheck, withdraw “tooth fairy” money for the kids, cash a check, even to use cash – 1%.”

These financial attacks against you and me are only another tool that the leftist extremists, lead by the Usurper in Chief, are using to castrate the American people. If you take away our money, we have nothing to fight you with. If we can’t feed ourselves, we are too weak to lift our voice.

3 – Personal Security

The Second Amendment prohibits the Federal government from taking away our right to bear arms to protect ourselves from vicious criminals as well as calling for an ever-ready militia in case of invasion or the presence of an authoritarian regime in America. Because we are commanded by God to protect our families and ourselves, the Second Amendment “grants” you and me nothing. We already have that right ordained by our Creator.

Recently there have been attacks on this right. And in the very near future we will see gun control becoming an absolute. Next Tuesday, on September 14, 2010, the Senate Judiciary Committee will review the firearms commercial markets (http://judiciary.senate.gov/hearings/hearing.cfm?id=4771).

Given Senator Leahy’s (D-VT)extreme anti-gun rights stance, and his position as the Chairman of the Committee, this meeting cannot go well. There is very little information being released at this time, however, key members of the Judiciary Committee have stated that it is response to “commercial provisioning of firearms on the public market.” This basically means that we are going to see private sales attacked, possibly high end permits for owning and purchasing guns, the need to have a permit to purchase ammo, etc.

While the courts may find these types of actions do not violate the Second Amendment, increasing the costs of - and decreasing the accessibility of - acquiring firearms and ammunition are flat out in violation of both the spirit and plain reading of the Constitution. This is quite possibly in response to Montana’s legislation HOUSE BILL 246 (http://data.opi.mt.gov/bills/2009/billhtml/HB0246.htm), stating that the Federal Government’s imposing power does have limits found in the 10th Amendment (http://secondamendmentman.blogspot.com/p/constitution-of-united-states.html) and that sovereignty over Montana, remains with the state of Montana. Further in the bill it provisions that firearms or ammunition manufactured in Montana, that stay in Montana, are not under and cannot be federally regulated. Many other states must follow suit.

Remember folks, the 9th and 10th amendment states two things. The 9th Amendment states that any duties that are not authorized by the Constitution belong to the states or to the people. The 10th Amendment states that the federal government does not get any power that the Constitution does not expressly give it. The federal government has no rights. It has only duties given to it by its creators (the states) and the whole purpose of the Constitution was to prevent them from usurping unauthorized authority. We should step out of our ignorance and step up to the Usurper. Let us show Congress that we will not take any more of this destruction of our hollowed nation. Millions of Americans have fought, shed blood or died for our nation since its birth. The least we can do is pay homage to it enough to see it thrive and not die in the hands of the Usurper in Chief and his minions.

Consider this, we are taxed to a point where we cannot afford food or energy, we have no strength to protect ourselves even if we needed to, but now with no money, we cannot afford to buy our protection with anything but subservience to the messianic fallacy himself.

“Oh Great Usurper, will you allow us to protect our homes or feed our children?”

Not going to happen on this front. The Usurper in Chief has driven Americans to the point where we will fight back. It may not be just yet, but it will be soon. The Usurper in Chief wants a revolution of great proportion? He will get it by the hands and blood of true Americans.

He will get his revolution.

“In times of change, the Patriot is a scarce man; brave, hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, however, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a Patriot.” Mark Twain

Washington Times Publishes Call For Impeachment

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/jul/22/the-case-for-impeachment-142967590/?page=1

President Obama has engaged in numerous high crimes and misdemeanors. The Democratic majority in Congress is in peril as Americans reject his agenda. Yet more must be done: Mr. Obama should be impeached.

He is slowly - piece by painful piece - erecting a socialist dictatorship. We are not there - yet. But he is putting America on that dangerous path. He is undermining our constitutional system of checks and balances; subverting democratic procedures and the rule of law; presiding over a corrupt, gangster regime; and assaulting the very pillars of traditional capitalism. Like Venezuela's leftist strongman, Hugo Chavez, Mr. Obama is bent on imposing a revolution from above - one that is polarizing America along racial, political and ideological lines. Mr. Obama is the most divisive president since Richard Nixon. His policies are Balkanizing the country. It's time for him to go.

It is about time some one has the backbone to print the truth about the matter.  I hope each and every one of you out there gets a chance to read this mans article in the Washington Times. 

There is a large supporting argument that is backed by our Nation's ever-growing feelings that the Usurper in Chief must go.  I cannot put it in any better terms than the way Mr.  Jeffrey T. Kuhner did in this article.

America Land of the Free No More‏

You will never believe what the Usurper in Chief has done now. Never in my life would I imagine that this could happen to such a great nation.

We are losing our sovereignty, our ability to rule ourselves.

The Usurper in Chief has filed charges of human rights violations against the state of Arizona. These charges were filed against Arizona, not to a state or federal judge, but to the United Nations Human Rights Counsel.

The Usurper in Chief is the only president in American history to have gone to any other form of governing body to enforce or change laws in our nation. One of the problems with this whole scenario is that the Usurper in Chief did not even read the Arizona law. If he did, He would realize that it states several times in the legislation that there is no power to do anything outside or above the existing federal immigration law.

Let me sum up the Arizona law for you, as it is about 15 pages long. The major points are as follows:

1. No one should be living in the state of Arizona unless they are lawfully permitted to live in the United States of America.
2. If by any normal legal means, you are found to be living in the state of Arizona unlawfully, you will be detained and prosecuted.
3. It is only by reasonable suspicion that an officer of the law may question your legal status.
4. You may need to prove legal residence in order to rent or buy property, get a job or solicit work.
5. If you are an employer and repeatedly hire unlawful workers you can and most likely will lose your business licensing indefinitely.
6. If you are questioned about your legal residency status and are found illegal you can be deported after you pay your fines.
7. If you are unlawfully in the United States don’t get caught with guns or drugs or the chemicals to make drugs or bombs.
8. If you are an unlawful resident, get caught with in a car, and you don’t have a sober spouse over the age of 21 when you are arrested, your car will be impounded.
9. If you are found to be repeating your unlawful entrance to the United States, you will find yourself facing felony charges.

There are a few more details but the meat and potatoes are there. There is absolutely nothing about race, ethnicity or profiling in the law. However, I strongly suggest that if you are stopped by a cop in Arizona, well, speak English.

With that said, the Usurper in Chief has deemed it appropriate – which it is not – to charge Arizona with human rights violations – which they do not – because this law specifically precludes the use of racial and ethnic profiling – which it does not – and he sees it as a means of racism – which it is not.

Keep in mind that the Usurper in Chief has stated that he has not ever read the bill. Maybe he should.

In the report he filed with the United Nations, however, there was a much different story. His report is 29 pages, most of which is his descriptive and creative version of American History and how we are and have been consistent with the oppression and demonization of minorities of race and orientation.

He goes on to declare that he has made many improvements while in office to rectify the oppression in America. He even goes on to state that he is proud to have a majority of LGBT people on his personal staff and as cabinet directors. Good for him.

He briefly describes the situation in Arizona and makes more fluff statements about how he is doing this or that to better the human rights “situation” in America.

Why is this such a problem, you may ask?

Well, the biggest issue is the whole idea of the United Nations becoming a governing power over what is and has always been a free nation. Unfortunately, when the Usurper in Chief decided to hand the power of the American people over to the United Nations, that leaves the door wide open for them to step in and start enacting their laws in the state of Arizona if they do not concede and remove the law.

The Usurper in Chief has stated several times that he is ready for the New World Order and this is just the excuse he was looking for. Why else after losing lawsuits among the federal judges would he usurp the American democratic procedure and appeal to international law?

What is really disconcerting is that there are another 22 states that have or are proposing to have nearly identical legislation on the table in the near future:

# OF STATES ATTEMPTING VERSIONS OF AZ's SB 1070: 22
ALABAMA http://www.alipac.us/article-5570-thread-1-0.html
ARKANSAS http://www.alipac.us/ftopict-197465.html
COLORADO http://www.alipac.us/article-5571-thread-1-0.html
FLORIDA http://www.alipac.us/ftopicp-1081285.html
IDAHO http://www.alipac.us/ftopict-199712.html
INDIANA http://www.alipac.us/ftopict-198939.html
MARYLAND http://www.alipac.us/ftopict-196969.html
MICHIGAN http://www.alipac.us/ftopict-198354.html
MINNESOTA http://www.alipac.us/ftopict-196774.html
MISSOURI http://www.alipac.us/ftopict-196852.html
NEBRASKA http://www.alipac.us/ftopicp-1063462.html
NEVADA http://www.alipac.us/ftopict-197562.html
NEW JERSEY http://www.alipac.us/ftopict-196431.html  
NORTH CAROLINA http://www.alipac.us/ftopicp-1067121.html
OHIO http://www.alipac.us/ftopict-196379.html
OKLAHOMA http://www.alipac.us/ftopict-196263.html
PENNSYLVANIA http://www.alipac.us/ftopicp-1052137.html
RHODE ISLAND http://www.alipac.us/ftopict-199918.html
SOUTH CAROLINA http://www.alipac.us/ftopict-197015.html
TENNESSEE http://www.alipac.us/ftopict-204376.html
TEXAS http://www.alipac.us/ftopict-196627.html
UTAH http://www.alipac.us/ftopict-196365.html  

If the Usurper in Chief gets his way with Arizona he will be taking on half of this nation. If the United Nations does decide against Arizona, then with Arizona the rest could fall under the United Nations jurisdiction.

The United Nations has no authority to make any law in the United States.
Now consider that 64% of Americans support an Arizona S.B. 1070 type law in their state (Source: http://bit.ly/9q0WyB). What does this mean to the Usurper in Chief?

Nothing. We mean absolutely nothing. America means absolutely nothing. Democracy means absolutely nothing. Only the “leftist-progressive-social justice.”

What was it Reverend Wright taught about Liberation Theology?

Remember that the Constitution is THE end all when it comes to American Governance. The United States code backs it up. The United Nations is blocked by the Constitution and has NO sovereignty over the United States. This is a treasonous act and grounds for impeachment, Usurper in Chief be warned.


You tread on dangerous ground.


You Decide…

Where To find the United States Immigration and Nationality Act
http://uscode.house.gov/download/title_08.shtml

Where to find the Usurper in Chief’s report to the UN
http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/146379.pdf

Where to find the Arizona S.B. 1070
http://www.azleg.gov/legtext/49leg/2r/bills/sb1070s.pdf

Authoritarianism

http://www.answers.com/topic/authoritarianism

Principle of unqualified submission to authority, as opposed to individual freedom of thought and action. As a political system, authoritarianism is antidemocratic in that political power is concentrated in a leader or small elite not constitutionally responsible to those governed. It differs from totalitarianism in that authoritarian governments usually lack a guiding ideology, tolerate some pluralism in social organization, lack the power to mobilize the whole population in pursuit of national goals, and exercise their power within relatively predictable limits. See also absolutism, dictatorship.

I just have to say something quick and brief here.  How many Czars of whatever are ther entitled to the Usurper In Chief by the Constitution?

What about the spending that will ultimately be America's end?

JOBS? LAWS? POWER GRABS? CORRUPTION? SPENDING? OBAMACARE? EDUCATION AND INDOCTRINATION OF KINDERGARTENERS TO HOMOSEXUALITY?


REALLY?